E-mail problem reports to: olooney@cviog.uga.edu


Once you have logged in, you will be taken to a Control Page where you will begin to build an application. The type of application you chose will be displayed. Since this is your first time using the software, choose the New Application button
Later,
after you have created an application, you can return to this page to load it
again, or you can also use the condition statements from one type of
application as the basis for building the other type of applications, but you
can ignore this “Transform to…Application Type” box.
Click on the New Application
button. to go to the Create Personalization Form (light brown).
When you reach this form, you
will notice that it has already been given a unique name and that two sample
profile questions have been filled in You can click the submit button if you wanted to finish
setting up an application that provided personalized messages to people based
on their age and whether they smoked or not. However, if you want to set up your own application, you
should give it a unique name and should
overwrite the existing
profile questions as well as add any others you want.
You can
ignore Weight and other optional
factors that are marked in blue. .
(When a person (or system user or client) fills out a profile form on the web, they will be answering the questions or responding to the condition statements you have specified.) You can develop up to 15 profile questions
{ For
Priority Type applications the only choice is for a SCALE response since this type
application provides a priority list of messages based on how far from the
ideal choice the client's choice is.
}
[ For Occurrence
Type applications,
these condition statements can be of 3 Kinds:
·1) YES-NO: this
choice automatically provide a Yes and No label for these two answer
choices.
2)
SCALE: this choice automatically create a response set of five
choices, essentially 1 to 5 on a 5 point Very False-to-Very True Scale,
· 3) LABEL: you can create up
to 5 specific answers for which you provide a label. By labeling a choice
using the label input fields, you will be able to make the personalization
applications more efficient in that you will be able to construct
conditions/questions that require a specific answer rather than a response on a
numerical scale. ]

When you submit the Creation
Form, you will see two buttons. 

When you have finished creating a message, you click the Add Message button. You will then be given the options to correct your message, add another message, or moving on to Step 3 (finish adding messages and begin building logic).

Step 3: Adding Logic
When you have created all the
messages you want, choose the Finish Adding Messages button. This will bring you to an Adding
Logic form
where you will begin to establish a link between one of the messages and the
conditions statements you want to be involved in whether a person receives that
particular message.

For
Occurrence Type applications, You specify the required pattern by using the series of Condition Direction radio
buttons in combination with the series of Value radio buttons . The Direction buttons are: [ = or Equal
to ] [
=LT or Equal to or Less
Than] [ =GT or Equal to or Greater Than]
Value
buttons include an NA
or Not Applicable button and five more buttons that have underlying values
ranging from left to right or 1 to 5. (Note: if you specified a YesNO or Label
kind of condition statement, you may not have all five of the value buttons,
but for those button you have the underlying values still run from 1 to how
ever many buttons you have.) Using a combination of a Direction and a Value,
you can specify that a text will be returned based on any set of values (both
within a single condition statement or across a number of condition
statements). The default Value button begins with each condition statement
being NA or Not Applicable to whether text will be returned or not. You will
need to specify that at least one of the statements is applicable.
Important Tip: If you want a textblock to be returned
no matter what, you will need to set one of the statements to a logic value of 1 (or very false) and keep the
default direction value of Greater than or equal to (GT=).
Example: You have
three conditions. 1. You are over 25 years old. 2. You are
interested in sports. 3. You value advice from famous people. A simple logic statement might say that
the text, "This text is for an older person who does not like
sports…" will be returned whenever a system user indicated that they were
over 25 years old. In this case, the logic value of the age question might be 3
(the middle value) with a directional value of "equal to or greater than
" (GT= ). …AND below (or less than or equal LT= ) a certain
level of interest in sports WHILE the condition “ respect for celebrity
spokespersons” remains Not Applicable. By setting out different texts
that will be returned based on different patterns of logic one might have one
client, who is interested in sports, receive a Yogi Bera endorsement while
another receives an endorsement from a different type of celebrity figure or no
spokesperson at all.
Once you have set logic pattern, you then submit the form. At this point, you can stop or more likely you will want to keep adding new TextLogic blocks in ways that insure, for example, that no matter how a person answers their profile questions or conditions, they will receive some response that is tailor to their needs. For example, one might want to have those who have responded at a 3 level or greater to the statement "You are old." receive the message "Now is the time to sign up for our retirement plan.", while those that responded at 2 or lower would receive the message "Buy your ski tickets now." This would be accomplished by creating two TextLogic blocks (one set with the Direction button at =GT and the value button at 3, and the other with the Direction button at =LT and the value button at 2). Tips: Ignore the Priority Value dropdown box and the Optional Parameters with one exception: If you want to repeat a message that you have already written out in a previous Textblock you can use the Set Text the same as Textblock# dropdown box in the optional parameter.
After you submit your logic by clicking on the Make Logical Connection
button, you can choose to Return
to the Logic Connection (to make corrections), Make More Logical Connections,
Review your logic and messages, GO to Step 4 (Finish & Test the
Application) or Go to the Control
Panel.

If you choose the
Finish and Text button, you will then see a form that replicates what a
potential client or user might see. Click on the various radio buttons, to
provide profile data, and click the submit button. Test the various responses
to the condition statements to be sure that they return the appropriate text.
Options:
You can choose among different separators for the text that is returned (Sep1)
as well as for the text that exists in the system but that is not being
returned (NullSep). You can also choose to allow repetition of the same
text block or message (by setting the Allow Repeats selection to
"true") or to not allow repetition (by setting the Allow
Repeats selection to "false"). If you created a Priority Type application, the Priority Type dropdown
list must be set to "true", but if you created an Occurance
Type application the Priority Type dropdown list must be set to
"false". The Priority Type value is automatically set by your
log in choice or by the Priority Type check box on the control page, but if you
get an error page when you try to demo the application, try resetting this
Priority Type choice

.
Often you will need to revise
an application you have built. To do
so you will need to go to the Control Panel.

The first four buttons on the
Control Panel allow you to add to the existing application’s store of profile
questions, messages and logical links between messages and profiles. You can pretty much use these functions
as you did the first time you created the application. The next two buttons allow you to
revise the application. Use the Revise
Profile button to call up a form with all the existing profile
questions. Once this form is up,
you can make and submit the changes.
Use the Review Messages/Logic
to revise these elements of the application. When you click on this button, you will be presented with a page
with a list of the text of the messages on the right hand and two sets of links
on the left hand. If you want to
revise the message, you will click on the Revise Message
link. This will take you to a form
with the existing message. You can
make the changes needed and submit the revisions. Your corrected message will be returned

. To Revise the logic links, choose the Review Logic Links hyperlink. If there is only logic link pattern for this message, you will be returned a form with this logic pattern from which you can make the necessary revisions. If there is more than one logic link pattern, you will be returned a form with the first logic set you created for the message as well as a set of links to the subsequent logic linked you created for this message. (i.e., Logic Set 1… to Logic Set N). When you click on a link to the logic set you want to revise, you will be taken to a form for revising that logic pattern.

For each personalization
application-building task there are a number of subtasks that can vary in
difficulty. Your first task is to discover all of the possible condition
statements or profile questions that would need to be asked in order to develop
the application. Once these have
been entered, you will need to set up the logic for what text messages would be
returned under what circumstances.
Your greatest challenge will be
to make sure that a complete set of text-logic configurations are specified so
that no matter how a web client answers a profile question, the client will
receive some message and will not receive any conflicting messages. For example, if you are asked to create
an application such that clients receive a message that they are either at
high or low risk (or probability) of experiencing a particular outcome
(e.g., being eligible for a program or experiencing an illness). This requirement that there not be multiple messages
requires a working out of the logic in advance. Here are some suggestions for
dealing with different types of text-logic challenges related to the
requirement of providing the
client with a single, non-repeated
message for each issue.
Example
Marketing Report: All else being equal, wealthier people
are more likely to need a reminder to file a luxury tax.
Impacted
Condition Statements: You are very wealthy. (SCALE)
Scale: Very
False 1 2 3 4 5
Very True
|
Text Message |
Logic |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very
likely to need to file a luxury tax. |
Wealth condition is equal to or
greater than (=GT) 4. |
|
|
|
|
3. LOW RISK: You are not likely
to need to file a luxury tax. |
Wealth condition is equal to or
less than (=LT) 2.
|
Example
Marketing Report:
All else
being equal, wealthier people are more likely to need a reminder to file a
luxury tax.
No matter how other factors
affect the likely need to file a luxury tax, a person with a disability will be
at a low risk of having to file a luxury tax..
Impacted
Condition Statements:
You
have a disability (YES/NO)
You are very wealthy. (SCALE)
Scale: Very
False 1 2 3 4 5
Very True
|
Text Message |
Logic |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very
likely to need to file a luxury tax. |
1. Wealth condition is equal to
or greater than (=GT) 4. Disability condition is No (=)
NO. |
|
|
|
|
2.LOW RISK: You are not likely to need to file a
luxury tax. |
2. Wealth condition is equal to
or less than 3.
(=LT) 3 Disability condition is No (=)
NO.
3. Wealth condition is equal to
or greater than (=GT) 1. (i.e.,
any wealth condition) Disability condition is Yes (=)
Yes. |
Note that in One Factor
Relationship with Qualifications case, a person is only likely to get a message
of having a high probability of having to file if the disability
factor is not evident. However,
there are two sets of conditions under which a person would receive the low
probability message: one where there is no disability condition, but wealth is
low, and one where there is a disability condition.
Example
Marketing Report:
All
else being equal, wealthier people are more likely to need a reminder to file a
luxury tax. (SCALE)
All
else being equal, the more homes
people own the more likely they
are to need to file a luxury
tax. (SCALE)
Impacted
Condition Statements:
You are very wealthy.
You own several homes..
Scale: Very
False 1 2 3 4 5
Very True
|
Text Message |
Logic Settings |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very likely to need to file a luxury
tax. |
1. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 4. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3. 2. Wealth
condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 4. |
|
2. LOW RISK: You
are unlikely to have to file a luxury tax. |
3. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Home ownership condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. 4. Wealth condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. |
In the Two Factor Relationship
situation, it is necessary to set
some criteria that allows one to discriminate among the two message types. While there could be different ways
of doing this, for the purpose of this exercise, you are instructed to specify
high probability in the
following manner: at least one condition has to be equal to or greater than 4,
while the other condition has to be equal to or greater than 3.
The low probability group must include all of the remaining possibilities. This would mean that if either condition was equal to or less than 2, the person would be of low risk –no matter what the value of the other condition was.
Important Tip: Even though there are only two possible messages, you will need to complete four Text-Logic forms. In the example above, you would repeat Message #2 (the LOW RISK message) under two different logic patterns (i.e., #3 & #4 under Logic Settings)
Example
Marketing Report:
All
else being equal, wealthier people are more likely to need a reminder to file a
luxury tax. (SCALE)
All
else being equal, the more homes
people own the more likely they
are to need to file a luxury
tax. (SCALE)
No
matter how other factors affect the likely need to file a luxury tax, a person
with a disability will be at a low risk of having to file a luxury
tax.(YES/NO).
Impacted
Condition Statements:
You are very wealthy.
You own more than one home.
You have a disability.
Scale: Very
False 1 2 3 4 5
Very True
|
Text Message |
Logic Settings |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very likely to need to file a luxury
tax. |
1. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 4. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3.
Disability condition is equal to NO (=) No 2. Wealth
condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT)
4. Disability condition is equal
to NO (=) No |
|
2. LOW RISK: You
are unlikely to have to file a luxury tax. |
3. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Home ownership condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. Disability condition is
equal to NO (=) No 4. Wealth condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Disability condition is equal
to NO (=) No. 5. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Disability condition is equal to NO (=) No. |
The Two Factor Plus
Qualification situation essentially is
the same as the preceding one except that now one must factor in a
qualification condition in each of the logic settings. This requirement results in the example
above in: 1) the need to set the disability condition to a not evident setting
(i.e.,= NO or in a scale setting
=LT 2) for all the situations where one is going to indicate that a luxury tax
filing might be called for; and 2) to need to include all possible responses to
the first two conditions (wealth & home ownership) along with a disability setting
of evident (= NO or in a scales setting
=GT 3). Essentially, the
qualifying factor acts as a sort of trump card. Whenever it is not evident, the logic the message response
is dependent on the other factors; however, when it is evident, it controls the
response no matter what the values for the other settings.
Important Tip: Even though
there are only two possible messages, you will need to complete five Text-Logic
forms. In the example above, you
would repeat Message #2 (the LOW RISK message) under three different logic
patterns (i.e., #3 , #4, #5 under Logic Settings)
Basic Guidelines for Usability Test.
1. Keep your messages very simple: “You are at [high/low] risk of …..”.
2. One message (e.g., “You are at high risk of illness”) will sometimes need to be linked to more than one logic pattern that will produce the message. The exercise will tell you the total number of expected logic patterns needed. Remember to create at least one “high risk” message and one “low risk” message for each dimension of the exercise (e.g., risk of illness, crime, etc.).
3. Each message should convey only ONE idea (e.g., “You are at high risk of illness”, NOT “You are at high risk of illness and high risk of crime.”).
4. Use
only the SCALE and YES/NO options.
Do not use the LABEL option.
Your goal in personalizing the emergency management
section of the web site should be to provide the citizen-users with a sense of
their risk (HIGH or LOW) for each of the following dangers:
To keep the messages simple, you will need only to
indicate whether a family is likely to be at high or low risk for each of these
threats. For the entire exercise you will need to produce:
Issue A. Illness
Risk [2 logic patterns]
One Condition/profile factor affects illness risk:
Two Condition/profile factors affect dispute risk:
GUIDING EXAMPLE for Dealing
with Issue B
All else being equal,
wealthier people are more likely to need a reminder to file a luxury tax.
No matter how other factors affect the likely need to file
a luxury tax, a person with a disability will be at a low risk of having to
file a luxury tax..
|
Text Message |
Logic |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very
likely to need to file a luxury tax. |
1. Wealth condition is equal
to or greater than (=GT) 4. Disability condition is No
(=) NO.
|
|
2.LOW RISK: You are not likely to need to file a
luxury tax. |
2. Wealth condition is equal
to or less than 3.
(=LT) 3 Disability condition is No
(=) NO.
3. Wealth condition is equal
to or greater than (=GT) 1.
(i.e., any wealth condition) Disability condition is Yes
(=) Yes. |
Two Condition/profile factors
affect crime risk:
a.
All else being equal, families
with more aggressive pets are at higher risk of crime (SCALE).
b.
All else being equal, families
with more children are at higher risk of crime (SCALE).
While a number of different logic patterns could be used to establish high and low risk, for the purpose of this exercise, you are instructed to provide a high risk message when: at least one condition is at the True or Very True level (i.e., equal to or greater than 4), while the other condition is at least at the neutral level (i.e., equal to or greater than 3). Because the low risk group must include all of the remaining possibilities, this would mean that if either condition were less than the neutral level (i.e., equal to or less than 2), the person would be of low risk –no matter what the value of the other condition was. Low risk would also occur when both conditions are neutral. It takes three logic patterns to state this.
|
Text Message |
Logic Settings |
|
1. HIGH RISK: You are very likely to need to file a luxury
tax. |
1. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 4. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3. 2. Wealth
condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 3. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 4. |
|
2. LOW RISK: You
are unlikely to have to file a luxury tax. |
3. Wealth condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. Home ownership condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. 4. Wealth condition is equal to or less than (=LT) 2. Home ownership condition is equal to or greater than (=GT) 1. 5. Wealth condition is equal to (=) 3. Home ownership condition is equal to (=) 3. |
Your immediate goal in personalizing the health and
wellness section of the web site is to provide the citizen-users with a sense of
their level of risk (HIGH or LOW) for each of the following dangers:
Keep the messages simple: only indicate whether a family
is likely to be at high or low risk for each of these threats
For the entire exercise you will need to produce:
Our research indicates that:
Issue A. Heart
Attack [2 logic patterns]
While
a number of different logic patterns could be used to establish high and low
risk, for the purpose of this exercise, you are instructed to provide a high
risk message when: at least one condition is at the True or Very True level
(i.e., equal to or greater than 4), while the other condition is at least at
the neutral level (i.e., equal to or greater than 3). Because the low risk group must include all of the
remaining possibilities, this would mean that if either condition were less
than the neutral level (i.e., equal to or less than 2), the person would be of
low risk –no matter what the value of the other condition was. Low risk would also occur when both conditions
are neutral. It takes three logic patterns to state this. (see example from
first marketing report).
In building a Priority
Type personalization application, your goal will be to determine in what
sequence (or priority order from top to bottom) a series of messages will
appear. The priority order should
be guided by the information in the marketing report. For some issues in the report, there will be only a single
factor that is reported as affecting a person’s risk or interest (and hence the
priority of a textblock or message).
For other issues, multiple factors will contribute to risk or
interest. In the case where
multiple factors make a contribution, the contribution to risk/interest is
apportioned equally to each factor.
The key thing to remember is the highest priority message for an end
user is the one in which there is the least difference between the text-logic
of the message and the logic pattern of the end user’s responses to the profile
questions. For example,
assume a text message (e.g., “This is a message for Tall people.” ) is associated
with a profile/condition statement (e.g., You are tall? ) that has been given a Priority Value of 5 (or very true) . If an end user responds to the question
about whether they are tall with a 5 (or very true), the specified text message will have a very high probability
of being returned at the top of the list of messages because there would be
zero distance between the priority value (5) and the response value (5). To help you judge the level of
priority of any give text message a number representing the difference between
the set priority and the end user’s response is returned with each
message. Numbers closer to zero
have higher priority.
Example: You are asked
to build an application where there are separate messages indicating likely computer
job success and professional wrestling success that will be returned
in a priority order depending on the degree to which an end user answers three
profile questions:
The marketing report indicates that the only factor found
to contribute to computer job success is school grades. However, two factors (e.g., flexibility and weight) are found to
contribute to success as a wrestler.
A person would be of equal likelihood of computer job success and wrestling
success only in cases where
grades, flexibility and weight were all of equal value on the
Personalization System’s 5-point value scale. However, if the Grades factor is rated at a 4, and
Flexibility is rated at a 4, but Weight is rated at a 3, then the computer job
success message will be returned before wrestling success one—because the total
wrestling success priority points were distributed among the contributing
factors.
That is, Computer Job success = The score for
the factor grade factor/number of factors
or
Wrestling success =
(The score for the factor Flexibility factor + The score for the factor Weight
factor) /number of factors
Now assuming that you set the Priority
value = 5, the message with the highest priority is the one where the end
user’s response is closest to the Priority Value setting. In this case, the end users response
would result in the message of “You are likely to have computer job
success” being of higher priority.
Wrestling Success = 5 - 3.5 =
1.5
Computer Job Success =
5 –4 = 1
----à closest to zero!
Hence, the Job Success message in
this case would have the highest priority.
Imagine that you were given the task of building a web site
where different types of tax advice were given priority on the page based on a
person’s profile. Specifically,
you are asked to prioritize taxpayer:
Condition Statements &
Logic: These area the things you will know about your web visitors
and how these things relate to the visitor’s need for specific types of
information.
·
You are very wealthy.
(Increases probability of luxury and estate tax, but is not applicable to
Childhood deduction)
·
You own more than one home. (Increases
probability of estate tax, but is not applicable to luxury tax or childhood
deduction)
·
You have lots of children
(Increases probability of childhood deduction; lowers probability of estate
tax, but is not applicable to luxury tax )
Scale: You will know
to what extent these conditions are true for each visitor based on a scale of :
Very
False 1 2 3
4 5 Very True
1. Text Message: Here is some advice on how to deal with a luxury tax.

2. Text Message: Here is some advice on how to deal with the Estate Tax.

*Note: By setting the priority value to
1 and, one is essentially saying that the Advice on Estate Tax will be of lower
probability if the user indicates having a lot of children.
3. Text Message: Here
is some advice on how to work with Tax Deductions for children.

Basic Rules for Usability Test.
· Be sure not to confuse the condition/profile with the message textblocks. Condition/profile questions usually will take the form of something like “Are you old?” All message textblocks should take the simple form of: “You are at [high/low] risk of …..”.
· Each exercise can and should be completed within a single application. Only create a second application for the second exercise. need to create a larger number of textblocks than you probably expect. The exercise will tell you the total number of expected textblock messages. Remember to create at least one “high risk” message and one “low risk” message for each dimension of the exercise (e.g., risk of illness or of crime would be a dimension). Often you will need to create more than one of the same basic high/low risk messages for a dimension. The duplicate messages, however, will have a different underlying logic.
· Each message textblock should convey ONLY ONE message (e.g., “You should be concerned about your risk of illness”, NOT “You should be concerned about your risk of illness and you should be concerned about your risk of crime.”).
Your goal in personalizing the emergency management section
of the web site should be to provide the citizen-users with priority-ordered
information that is relevant to the level of risk that a family is likely to
experience in each of the following area:
Specifically, your task will be to have a series of risk
advice messages (e.g., “You should consider preparing to prevent fire” or “Here
are some tips on how to resolve neighborhood disputes”) appear in the order
that one is likely to be at risk of a particular threat or danger i.e., the
message for the risk with the highest probability of occurring for a particular
user will appear at the top of the list of messages.
Number of expected condition statements/questions: 4
Number of expected textblock messages: 4
Our research indicates that:
Illness
Risk
One condition/profile factor affects illness risk:
Two condition/profile factors affect fire risk:
Three condition/profile factors affect dispute risk :
Two condition/profile factors affect dispute risk :
Exercise 2: Health and Wellness Advisor
Application Marketing Report
Your immediate goal in personalizing the health and
wellness section of the web site is to provide the citizen-users with
priority-ordered information that is relevant to the level of risk that they
might experience with respect to each of the following dangers:
Specifically, your task will be to have a series of advice
messages appear in the order that one is likely to be at risk of a particular
health problem, i.e., the message for the problem with the highest
probability of occurring for a particular user will appear at the top of the
list of messages.
Number of expected condition statements/questions: 4
Number of expected textblock messages: 4
Our research indicates that:
Heart
Attack
Bone Disease
Use the Store Personal Profile control to create and store client profiles for your application. To create a proflie, the client needs to choose the application for which they want to create a profile for, type a unique ID into the ID field, and click the submit button. This will bring up the set of conditions/questions for the selected application. After they have answered the questions and submitted their responses. The profile is stored in the database and a cookie is set on the client's machine. With this cookie in place, you are then able to build web pages that request the cookie ID so that the client does not have to always enter their ID to receive personalized information.
Technical Stuff:
· One can create a separate web page by which your clients can create and store their responses by using the code below and replacing the NameofYourApplication with the actual name of your application.
<form name=b ACTION
=upstoreprofile.asp Method = Post>
<input type =hidden Name=UBERx
value="NameofYourApplication">
<input Name=idx size=8 >
<BR><input type =submit>
When a client supplies an Id this Id and the values of the client's answers to the condition statements is stored in a database. The id and the name of the application is also set as a cookie on the client's browser.
· In order to have the system automatically respond to a client the next time the client returns to the web site, it will be necessary to have a webpage that can read the specific cookie and respond appropriately. The showcookieresultsL file presents a template for this process. The administrator needs to only replace the value of the name of the application (use the application name for both the Uber and Id values; e.g., replace "healthadvice" with the name of your application) and rename the file (to something with an .asp ending) to have the personalization occur on a client's hitting that page of the web site. .
First, prioritization applications only allow one to set the logic in one direction--the greater than (GT=) direction. That is, you will want to create all your conditions so that the greater (more true) their responese are the more likely they will receive a certain bit of text. (Only statements that meet the minimum will be returned, but those that exceed the minimum by a great deal will be higher up on the priority list than those that exceed it by only a little). Also, you should set weights when you build your condition statements. The prioritization score is actually be the product of the condition weight (that the administrator sets) times the value that the client identifies as their response to a condition statement.
Second, one of the primary uses for a prioritization type personalization is the abiltiy to guide clients through a web site by giving them a set of prioritized links to pages in the site that they are likely to find of interest. This Personalization System provide you with a means of going through and rating a set of web site links automatically. The current version provides a set of demonstration links from a local goverment in Georgia. See List Sites to Rate in the control panel. However, by using a search engine, it is easy to create a database of links for any web site. These links can then be integrated into the system so as to allow easy rating.